Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A hot Jupiter orbiting a 2-million-year-old solar-mass T Tauri star

Subjects

Abstract

Hot Jupiters are giant Jupiter-like exoplanets that orbit their host stars 100 times more closely than Jupiter orbits the Sun. These planets presumably form in the outer part of the primordial disk from which both the central star and surrounding planets are born, then migrate inwards and yet avoid falling into their host star1. It is, however, unclear whether this occurs early in the lives of hot Jupiters, when they are still embedded within protoplanetary disks2, or later, once multiple planets are formed and interact3. Although numerous hot Jupiters have been detected around mature Sun-like stars, their existence has not yet been firmly demonstrated for young stars4,5,6, whose magnetic activity is so intense that it overshadows the radial velocity signal that close-in giant planets can induce. Here we report that the radial velocities of the young star V830 Tau exhibit a sine wave of period 4.93 days and semi-amplitude 75 metres per second, detected with a false-alarm probability of less than 0.03 per cent, after filtering out the magnetic activity plaguing the spectra. We find that this signal is unrelated to the 2.741-day rotation period of V830 Tau and we attribute it to the presence of a planet of mass 0.77 times that of Jupiter, orbiting at a distance of 0.057 astronomical units from the host star. Our result demonstrates that hot Jupiters can migrate inwards in less than two million years, probably as a result of planet–disk interactions2.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

  • The CUBES science case

    Experimental AstronomyOpen Access01 October 2022

访问该ns

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Brightness map of V830 Tau and fit to the LSD profiles.
Figure 2: Raw, filtered and residual radial velocities of V830 Tau.
Figure 3: Periodogram of the radial velocities and activity of V830 Tau.
Figure 4: Adjusting the planet parameters while modelling activity.

References

  1. Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P. & Richardson, D. C. Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location.Nature380, 606–607 (1996)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  2. Baruteau, C. et al. inProtostars and Planets VI(eds Beuther, H., Klessen, R., Dullemond, C. & Henning, T. )Vol. 914667 - 689(单v. Arizona Press, 2014)

    Google Scholar

  3. Chatterjee, S., Ford, E. B., Matsumura, S. & Rasio, F. A. Dynamical outcomes of planet-planet scattering.Astrophys. J.686, 580–602 (2008)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  4. Setiawan, J. et al. A young massive planet in a star–disk system.Nature451, 38–41 (2008)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  5. Huélamo, N. et al. TW Hydrae: evidence of stellar spots instead of a hot Jupiter.Astron. Astrophys.489, L9–L13 (2008)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  6. van Eyken, J. C. et al. The PTF Orion project: a possible planet transiting a T-Tauri star.Astrophys. J.755, 42–55 (2012)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  7. Kraus, A. L. & Ireland, M. J. LkCa 15: a young exoplanet caught at formation?Astrophys. J.745, 5–16 (2012)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  8. Sallum, S. et al. Accreting protoplanets in the LkCa 15 transition disk.Nature527, 342–344 (2015)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  9. Donati, J.-F. et al. The large-scale magnetic field and poleward mass accretion of the classical T Tauri star TW Hya.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.417, 472–487 (2011)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  10. Mahmud, N. I. et al. Starspot-induced optical and infrared radial velocity variability in T Tauri star Hubble I 4.Astrophys. J.736, 123–131 (2011)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  11. Donati, J.-F. et al. Modeling the magnetic activity and filtering radial velocity curves of young Suns: the weak-line T Tauri star LkCa 4.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.444, 3220–3229 (2014)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  12. Donati, J.-F. et al. Magnetic activity and hot Jupiters of young Suns: the weak-line T Tauri stars V819 Tau and V830 Tau.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.453, 3707–3720 (2015)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  13. Grankin, K. N., Bouvier, J., Herbst, W. & Melnikov, S. Y. Results of the ROTOR-program. II. The long-term photometric variability of weak-line T Tauri stars.Astron. Astrophys.479, 827–843 (2008)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  14. Siess, L., Dufour, E. & Forestini, M. An internet server for pre-main sequence tracks of low- and intermediate-mass stars.Astron. Astrophys.358593 - 599 (2000)

    ADSCASGoogle Scholar

  15. Kraus, A. L., Ireland, M. J., Hillenbrand, L. A. & Martinache, F. The role of multiplicity in disk evolution and planet formation.Astrophys. J.745, 19–29 (2012)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  16. Donati, J.-F., Semel, M., Carter, B. D., Rees, D. E. & Collier Cameron, A. Spectropolarimetric observations of active stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.291, 658–682 (1997)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  17. Vogt, S. S., Penrod, G. D. & Hatzes, A. P. Doppler images of rotating stars using maximum entropy image reconstruction.Astrophys. J.321, 496–515 (1987)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  18. Donati, J.-F. & Collier Cameron, A. Differential rotation and magnetic polarity patterns on AB Doradus.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.291, 1–19 (1997)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  19. Donati, J.-F., Collier Cameron, A. & Petit, P. Temporal fluctuations in the differential rotation of cool active stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.345, 1187–1199 (2003)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  20. Morin, J. et al. The stable magnetic field of the fully convective star V374 Peg.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.384, 77–86 (2008)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  21. Mortier, A., Faria, J. P., Correia, C. M., Santerne, A. & Santos, N. C. BGLS: A Bayesian formalism for the generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram.Astron. Astrophys.573, 101–106 (2015)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  22. Haywood, R. D. et al. The Sun as a planet-host star: proxies from SDO images for HARPS radial-velocity variations.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.457, 3637–3651 (2016)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  23. Lucy, L. B. & Sweeney, M. A. Spectroscopic binaries with circular orbits.Astron. J.76, 544–556 (1971)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  24. Petit, P. et al. A maximum entropy approach to detect close-in giant planets around active stars.Astron. Astrophys.584, 84–91 (2015)

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  25. Mayor, M. et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets. Preprint athttp://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2497(2011)

  26. Wright, J. T. et al. The frequency of hot Jupiters orbiting nearby solar-type stars.Astrophys. J.753, 160–164 (2012)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  27. Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. The occurrence and architecture of exoplanetary systems.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.53, 409–447 (2015)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  28. Ogilvie, G. I. Tidal dissipation in stars and giant planets.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.52, 171–210 (2014)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  29. Goldreich, P. & Soter, S.Qin the Solar System.Icarus5, 375–389 (1966)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  30. Donati, J.-F. et al. Magnetometry of the cTTS GQ Lup: non-stationary dynamos and spin evolution of young Suns.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.425, 2948–2963 (2012)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  31. Donati, J.-F. ESPaDOnS: An Echelle SpectroPolarimetric Device for the Observation of Stars at CFHT.ASP Conf. Proc.307, 41–50 (2003)

    ADSGoogle Scholar

  32. Chené, A. N. et al. GRACES: Gemini remote access to CFHT ESPaDOnS spectrograph through the longest astronomical fiber ever made: experimental phase completed.Proc. SPIE9151, 47–62 (2014)

    Google Scholar

  33. Moutou, C. et al. Spectropolarimetric observations of the transiting planetary system of the K dwarf HD 189733.Astron. Astrophys.473, 651–660 (2007)

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  34. Kurucz, R. ATLAS9 atmospheric models, ATLAS9 and SYNTHE routines, spectral line database. CDROM 13 and 18,http://kurucz.harvard.edu/cdroms.html(1993)

  35. Collier Cameron, A. Spot mapping in cool stars.Lecture Notes Phys.573, 183–206 (2001)

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  36. Morin, J. Magnetic fields from low-mass stars to brown dwarfs.EAS Publ. Ser.57, 165–191 (2012)

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on observations obtained at the CFHT Corporation (operated by the National Research Council of Canada, the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (INSU/CNRS) of France and the University of Hawaii), at the Télescope Bernard Lyot (TBL) (operated by the Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées and by INSU/CNRS), and at the Gemini Observatory (operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation (NSF) on behalf of the Gemini partnership: the NSF of the United States, the National Research Council of Canada, CONICyT of Chile, the Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva of Argentina, and the Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação of Brazil). We thank the Queue Service Observing teams of CFHT, TBL and the Gemini Observatory, without whom this study would not have been possible. We also thank the IDEX initiative of Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées for awarding a ‘Chaire d’Attractivité’ to G.H., in the framework of which this work was done. S.A. acknowledges financial support from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (Fapemig).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This work merged data collected with two different instruments and three different telescopes. J.F.D. led the data processing, analysis and manuscript preparation. C.M., L.M., L.Y. and E.H. participated in the data collection and data analysis. C.B. contributed to the theoretical implications of the results. All authors, including G.H., S.A., M.T., F.M., J.B., P.P., R.D. and A.C.C., were involved in elaborating the observing proposals, in discussing the results at various stages of the analysis, and in providing contributions to older versions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJ. F. Donati.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

扩展数据图1 Estimating the surface differential rotation parameter.

Variations of the reducedχ2as a function of the surface differential rotation parameters Ωeqand dΩ, denoting respectively the rotation rate at the equator and the difference in rotation rate between the equator and the pole (and assuming a solar-like sine-square differential rotation law). The location of the minimum and the local paraboloid curvature yield the optimal parameters and their respective 1σerror bars19, equal to 2.29525 ± 0.00020 and 0.0172 ± 0.0014 radians per day. The outer colour contour traces the 99.99% confidence interval (corresponding to aχ2increase of 18.4 for a two-parameter optimization problem).

扩展数据图2 Complementary periodograms.

a, Same asFig. 3a(middle plot) using the BGLS approach21, showing that the 4.93-day peak we detect is at least 105times more likely than any other features.b, Same asFig. 3bfor Hα emission, another activity proxy, featuring a clear peak at the stellar rotation period but no power at the planet orbital period.c, Same asFig. 3a(middle plot) for our new data combined with the 2015 January subsample of our original data12. The planet is now detected with a higher confidence level (FAP < 10−5) but the accuracy of the orbital period is not much improved (with multiple nearby peaks of similar strength). The red and green dashed lines are for the original and new data respectively.d, Same asc, zooming on the orbital frequency. The orbital period corresponding to the strongest peak is equal to 4.924 ± 0.004 days (1σerror bar).

扩展数据图3 Periodograms of simulated data.

a, Same asFig. 3, for simulated data computed using the brightness map, differential rotation and planet parameters inferred from the real data, and assuming the same coverage and similarS/N(equal for all LSD profiles). As for our observations, the planet signal is detected at a confidence level >99.9% in the filtered radial velocities despite being invisible in the raw radial velocities, and the planet parameters are well recovered. The periodogram of the raw radial velocities is very similar to that ofFig. 3, featuring the main peaks (atProtandProt/2) and their aliases; residual radial velocities mostly reflect the noise in the data.b, Same as the upper two panels ofabut with no planet included in the simulation. No signal with a confidence level >90% is recovered in the filtered radial velocities, demonstrating that the filtering process is not generating spurious radial velocity signals, in particular at a period of 4.93 days.

扩展数据图4 Radial velocity curves of simulated data.

a, Same asFig. 2afor the simulated data described inExtended Data Fig. 3a(using the same brightness map, differential rotation and planet parameters as those of V830 Tau b). The simulated radial velocities (periodograms shown inExtended Data Fig. 3a) share obvious similarities with the observed ones, and the planet signal is safely recovered (root-mean-square dispersion of residual radial velocities equal to 45 m s−1).b, Same as the middle panel ofabut with no planet included. As for the periodogram (seeExtended Data Fig. 3b, bottom panel), no signal is detected, further illustrating that activity induces no spurious planet signature. As forFig. 2, simulated radial velocity measurements are depicted in all panels with their 1σerror bars.

Extended Data Table 1 Journal of observations
Extended Data Table 2 Main parameters of the planet and of the host star
Extended Data Table 3 Journal of observations for the original data

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moutou、J。,C。,,L。et al.A hot Jupiter orbiting a 2-million-year-old solar-mass T Tauri star.Nature534, 662–666 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18305

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18305

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by ourTermsandCommunity Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefingnewsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing
Baidu
map