Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual

Nature(2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Increasing soil carbon and nitrogen storage can help mitigate climate change and sustain soil fertility1,2．A large number of biodiversity-manipulation experiments collectively suggest that high plant diversity increases soil carbon and nitrogen stocks3,4．It remains debated, however, whether such conclusions hold in natural ecosystems5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12．这里我们分析加拿大国家森林Inventory (NFI) database with the help of structural equation modelling (SEM) to explore the relationship between tree diversity and soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation in natural forests. We find that greater tree diversity is associated with higher soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation, validating inferences from biodiversity-manipulation experiments. Specifically, on a decadal scale, increasing species evenness from its minimum to maximum value increases soil carbon and nitrogen in the organic horizon by 30% and 42%, whereas increasing functional diversity enhances soil carbon and nitrogen in the mineral horizon by 32% and 50%, respectively. Our results highlight that conserving and promoting functionally diverse forests could promote soil carbon and nitrogen storage, enhancing both carbon sink capacity and soil nitrogen fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Suggested causal pathways of direct and indirect effects of tree diversity, identity, stand age, climate and background soil condition on tree productivity and changes in soil C and N stocks.
Fig. 2: Structural equation model showing the effects of tree diversity and climatic and soil conditions on decadal changes in soil C and N stocks in the organic soil horizon (N = 361).
Fig. 3: Structural equation model showing the effects of tree diversity and climatic and soil conditions on decadal changes in soil C and N stocks in the mineral soil horizon (N = 245).

Data availability

The source data underlying Figs.2and3are provided as source data files and all data used in this study are archived in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20988187.v2).Source dataare provided with this paper.

Code availability

The R scripts needed to reproduce the analysis are archived in Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20988187.v2).

References

  1. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security.Science304, 1623–1627 (2004).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur?.Biogeochemistry13, 87–115 (1991).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  3. Chen, X. L., Chen, H. Y. H., Searle, E. B., Chen, C. & Reich, P. B. Negative to positive shifts in diversity effects on soil nitrogen over time.Nat. Sustain.4, 225–234 (2021).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  4. Chen, X. et al. Effects of plant diversity on soil carbon in diverse ecosystems: a global meta-analysis.Biol. Rev.95, 167–183 (2020).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Chen, S. P. et al. Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 4027–4032 (2018).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

  6. Chen, X., Hisano, M., Taylor, A. R. & Chen, H. Y. H. The effects of functional diversity and identity (acquisitive versus conservative strategies) on soil carbon stocks are dependent on environmental contexts.For. Ecol. Manag.503, 119820 (2022).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  7. Dawud, S. M. et al. Is tree species diversity or species identity the more important driver of soil carbon stocks, C/N ratio, and pH?Ecosystems19, 645–660 (2016).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  8. Conti, G. & Diaz, S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage – an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems.J. Ecol.101, 18–28 (2013).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  9. van der Plas, F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities.Biol. Rev.94, 1220–1245 (2019).

    PubMedGoogle Scholar

  10. Gamfeldt, L. et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species.Nat. Commun.4, 1340 (2013).

    ArticleADSPubMedGoogle Scholar

  11. Dawud, S. M. et al. Tree species functional group is a more important driver of soil properties than tree species diversity across major European forest types.Funct. Ecol.31, 1153–1162 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  12. Ratcliffe, S. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context.Ecol. Lett.20, 1414–1426 (2017).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  13. Carvalhais, N. et al. Global covariation of carbon turnover times with climate in terrestrial ecosystems.Nature514, 213–217 (2014).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  14. Lange, M. et al. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage.Nat. Commun.6, 6707 (2015).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  15. Mao, Z. K. et al. Tree mycorrhizal associations mediate soil fertility effects on forest community structure in a temperate forest.New Phytol.223, 475–486 (2019).

    ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  16. Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H. & Taylor, A. R. Positive species diversity and above-ground biomass relationships are ubiquitous across forest strata despite interference from overstorey trees.Funct. Ecol.31, 419–426 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  17. Post, W. M., Pastor, J., Zinke, P. J. & Stangenberger, A. G. Global patterns of soil nitrogen storage.Nature317, 613–616 (1985).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  18. 京,x et al。以上,地下补arity rather than selection drive tree diversity–productivity relationships in European forests.Funct. Ecol.35, 1756–1767 (2021).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  19. 张超,T Bouriaud, O Avacaritei, d &锯屑,D. A. Stabilizing effects of diversity on aboveground wood production in forest ecosystems: linking patterns and processes.Ecol. Lett.17, 1560–1569 (2014).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  20. Jucker, T. et al. Climate modulates the effects of tree diversity on forest productivity.J. Ecol.104, 388–398 (2016).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  21. van der Voort, T. S. et al. Variability in14C contents of soil organic matter at the plot and regional scale across climatic and geologic gradients.Biogeosciences13, 3427–3439 (2016).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  22. Grace, J. B. et al. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness.Nature529, 390–393 (2016).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  23. Shovon, T. A., Kang, S., Scherer-Lorenzen, M. & Nock, C. A. Changes in the direction of the diversity–productivity relationship over 15 years of stand development in a planted temperate forest.J. Ecol.110, 1125–1137 (2022).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  24. De Deyn, G. B., Cornelissen, J. H. & Bardgett, R. D. Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes.Ecol. Lett.11, 516–531 (2008).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  25. Paquette, A. & Messier, C. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.20, 170–180 (2011).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  26. Weedon, J. T. et al. Global meta-analysis of wood decomposition rates: a role for trait variation among tree species?Ecol. Lett.12, 45–56 (2009).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  27. Chave, J. et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.Ecol. Lett.12, 351–366 (2009).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  28. Adair, E. C., Hooper, D. U., Paquette, A. & Hungate, B. A. Ecosystem context illuminates conflicting roles of plant diversity in carbon storage.Ecol. Lett.21, 1604–1619 (2018).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  29. Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D. M. & Cadotte, M. W. Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes.Ecology89, 1510–1520 (2008).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  30. Jackson, R. B. et al. The ecology of soil carbon: pools, vulnerabilities, and biotic and abiotic controls.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.48, 419–445 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  31. Chen, X. & Chen, H. Y. H. Global effects of plant litter alterations on soil CO2to the atmosphere.Glob. Change Biol.24, 3462–3471 (2018).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  32. Pietsch, K. A. et al. Global relationship of wood and leaf litter decomposability: the role of functional traits within and across plant organs.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.23, 1046–1057 (2014).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  33. Rosell, J. A., Gleason, S., Mendez-Alonzo, R., Chang, Y. & Westoby, M. Bark functional ecology: evidence for tradeoffs, functional coordination, and environment producing bark diversity.New Phytol.201, 486–497 (2014).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  34. Kahl, T. et al. Wood decay rates of 13 temperate tree species in relation to wood properties, enzyme activities and organismic diversities.For. Ecol. Manag.391, 86–95 (2017).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  35. Giardina, F. et al. Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability.Nat. Geosci.11, 405–409 (2018).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  36. Park, J. H. & Matzner, E. Controls on the release of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen from a deciduous forest floor investigated by manipulations of aboveground litter inputs and water flux.Biogeochemistry66, 265–286 (2003).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  37. Olson, J. S. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems.Ecology44, 322–331 (1963).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  38. Hassink, J. The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles.Plant Soil191, 77–87 (1997).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  39. Clemmensen, K. E. et al. Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest.Science339, 1615–1618 (2013).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  40. Preston, C. M., Bhatti, J. S., Flanagan, L. B. & Norris, C. Stocks, chemistry, and sensitivity to climate change of dead organic matter along the Canadian boreal forest transect case study.Clim. Change74, 223–251 (2006).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  41. Michalzik, B., Kalbitz, K., Park, J. H., Solinger, S. & Matzner, E. Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen – a synthesis for temperate forests.Biogeochemistry52, 173–205 (2001).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  42. Pastore, M. A., Hobbie, S. E. & Reich, P. B. Sensitivity of grassland carbon pools to plant diversity, elevated CO2, and soil nitrogen addition over 19 years.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA118, e2016965118 (2021).

    ArticleCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

  43. Yemshanov, D., McKenney, D. W. & Pedlar, J. H. Mapping forest composition from the Canadian National Forest Inventory and land cover classification maps.Environ. Monit. Assess.184, 4655–4669 (2012).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  44. Baeten, L. et al. Identifying the tree species compositions that maximize ecosystem functioning in European forests.J. Appl. Ecol.56, 733–744 (2019).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  45. Moles, A. T. et al. Global patterns in plant height.J. Ecol.97, 923–932 (2009).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  46. Dyk, A. Forest composition across Canada.Canadian Forest Servicehttps://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/publications?id=35724(2014).

  47. Butler, E. E. et al. Increasing functional diversity in a global land surface model illustrates uncertainties related to parameter simplification.J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci.127, e2021JG006606 (2022).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  48. Mason, R. E. et al. Evidence, causes, and consequences of declining nitrogen availability in terrestrial ecosystems.Science376, eabh3767 (2022).

    ArticleCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  49. Canadian Forest Inventory Committee.Canada’s National Forest Inventory – Design Overview. Version 3.2(Canadian Forest Service, 2004).

  50. Lambert, M. C., Ung, C. H. & Raulier, F. Canadian national tree aboveground biomass equations.Can. J. For. Res.35, 1996–2018 (2005).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  51. Chen, H. Y. H. & Klinka, K. Aboveground productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar mixed-species stands in southern coastal British Columbia.For. Ecol. Manag.184, 55–64 (2003).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  52. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range and British Columbia Ministry of Environment.Field Manual for Describing Terrestrial Ecosystems2nd edn (Province of British Columbia, 2010).

  53. Gillis, M. D., Omule, A. Y. & Brierley, T. Monitoring Canada’s forests: the National Forest Inventory.For. Chron.81, 214–221 (2005).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  54. Pearson, T. R. H., Brown, S. L. & Birdsey, R. A.Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of Forest Carbon(U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 2007).

  55. Pielou, E. C.An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology(Wiley, 1969).

  56. Reich, P. B. The world-wide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto.J. Ecol.102, 275–301 (2014).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  57. Kunstler, G. et al. Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition.Nature529, 204–207 (2016).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  58. Hisano, M. & Chen, H. Y. H. Spatial variation in climate modifies effects of functional diversity on biomass dynamics in natural forests across Canada.Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.29, 682–695 (2020).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  59. Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B. & Ellsworth, D. S. From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA94, 13730–13734 (1997).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

  60. Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.Nature428, 821–827 (2004).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  61. Kattge, J. et al. TRY – a global database of plant traits.Glob. Change Biol.17, 2905–2935 (2011).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  62. Laliberte, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits.Ecology91, 299–305 (2010).

    ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

  63. Ruiz-Benito, P. et al. Climate- and successional-related changes in functional composition of European forests are strongly driven by tree mortality.Glob. Change Biol.23, 4162–4176 (2017).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  64. Hisano, M., Ryo, M., Chen, X. & Chen, H. Y. H. Rapid functional shifts across high latitude forests over the last 65 years.Glob. Change Biol.27, 3846–3858 (2021).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  65. Diaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function.Nature529, 167–173 (2016).

    ArticleADSCASPubMedGoogle Scholar

  66. Zeugin, F., Potvin, C., Jansa, J. & Scherer-Lorenzen, M. Is tree diversity an important driver for phosphorus and nitrogen acquisition of a young tropical plantation?For. Ecol. Manag.260, 1424–1433 (2010).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  67. Régnière, J., St-Amant, R. & Béchard, A.BioSIM 10 User’s manual.Report No. LAU-X-137E (Natural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, 2014).

  68. Hogg, E. H. Temporal scaling of moisture and the forest-grassland boundary in western Canada.Agr. For. Meteorol.84, 115–122 (1997).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  69. Senici, D., Chen, H. Y. H., Bergeron, Y. & Cyr, D. Spatiotemporal variations of fire frequency in central boreal forest.Ecosystems13, 1227–1238 (2010).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  70. Rosseel, Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling.J. Stat. Softw.48, 1–36 (2012).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  71. Oberski, D. lavaan.survey: an R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models.J. Stat. Softw.571-27(2014)。

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  72. Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B. & McCoach, D. B. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom.Sociol. Methods Res.44, 486–507 (2015).

    ArticleMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

  73. R Core Team.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing(R统计的基础istical Computing, 2022).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service for sharing data from the National Forest Inventory database and the Discovery Grants programme (grant no. RGPIN-2018-05700 to S.X.C.) of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for supporting this research. H.Y.H.C. acknowledges the support from NSERC (RGPIN-2019–05109 and STPGP428641) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation and Ontario Research Fund (CFI36014). X.C. wishes to thank NSERC and the Government of Canada for a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship and P.B.R. acknowledges support by the U.S. National Science Foundation Biological Integration Institutes grant no. NSF-DBI-2021898.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Xinli Chen & Scott X. Chang

  2. Institute for Global Change Biology, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Xinli Chen & Peter B. Reich

  3. Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada

    Anthony R. Taylor

  4. Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA

    Peter B. Reich

  5. Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia

    Peter B. Reich

  6. Department of Ecosystem Studies, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Masumi Hisano

  7. Faculty of Natural Resources Management, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada

    Han Y. H. Chen

  8. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China

    Scott X. Chang

Authors
  1. Xinli Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Anthony R. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Peter B. Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. Masumi Hisano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Han Y. H. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

  6. Scott X. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMedGoogle Scholar

Contributions

X.C., P.B.R., H.Y.H.C. and S.X.C. were responsible for the conception and design of the project. X.C. and A.R.T. compiled data. X.C. analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. X.C., A.R.T., P.B.R., M.H., H.Y.H.C. and S.X.C. contributed to reviewing and editing. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toHan Y. H. ChenorScott X. Chang．

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Naturethanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Peer reviewer reportsare available.

Additional information

Publisher’s noteSpringer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The result of PCA showing permanent sampling plots and each functional identity.

CWM, community-weighted mean of trait value; CWMNmass, CWM of nitrogen content per leaf mass; CWMPmass, CWM of phosphorus content per leaf mass; CWMSLA, CWM of specific leaf area; CWMWD, CWM of wood density; CWMMH, CWM of maximum height. The first axis (PC1) represents traits associated with acquisitive versus conservative strategies, whereas the second axis (PC2) refers to traits associated with wood density (WD) versus the maximum height (MH) of trees.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The distributions of 406 ground plots from the Canadian NFI with climate and plant community characteristics information.

a, Long-term averages of mean annual temperature (MAT).b, Long-term averages of mean annual climate moisture index (CMI).c, Species richness.d, Species evenness.e, Functional diversity (FDis).f,g, CWM of trait value (CWMPC1, CWMPC2).h, Schematic diagram of the NFI ground plot.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The bivariate relationships between decadal changes in soil C and N stocks in the organic horizon (ΔSoil COrganicstock and ΔSoil NOrganicstock) and explanatory variables (n = 361) for all proposed causal paths in the structural equation model.

MAT, the long-term average of mean annual temperature; CMI, the long-term average of mean annual climate moisture index; FDis, functional diversity; Horizon thickness, initial organic horizon thickness; ΔThickness, decadal organic horizon soil thickness change. Higher CWMPC1值指示性状与贪婪有关strategy, whereas lower values indicate conservative strategy. Higher CWMPC2values indicate traits associated with lower tree maximum height (see Extended Data Fig.1).

Extended Data Fig. 4 The bivariate relationships between decadal changes in soil thickness in the organic horizon (ΔThickness) and explanatory variables (n = 361) for all proposed causal paths in the structural equation model.

All fitted regressions are significant atP < 0.05. MAT, the long-term average of mean annual temperature; CMI, the long-term average of mean annual climate moisture index; FDis, functional diversity; Horizon thickness, initial organic horizon thickness. Higher CWMPC1值指示性状与贪婪有关strategy, whereas lower values indicate conservative strategy. Higher CWMPC2values indicate traits associated with lower tree maximum height (see Extended Data Fig.1).

Extended Data Fig. 5 The bivariate relationships between decadal changes in soil C and N stocks in the mineral horizon (ΔSoil CMineralstock and ΔSoil NMineralstock) and explanatory variables (n = 245) for all proposed causal paths in the structural equation model.

All fitted regressions are significant atP < 0.05. MAT, the long-term average of mean annual temperature; CMI, the long-term average of mean annual climate moisture index; FDis, functional diversity. Higher CWMPC1值指示性状与贪婪有关strategy, whereas lower values indicate conservative strategy. Higher CWMPC2values indicate traits associated with lower tree maximum height (see Extended Data Fig.1).

Extended Data Fig. 6 The bivariate relationships between decadal aboveground primary productivity and explanatory variables for all proposed causal paths in the structural equation model.

All fitted regressions are significant atP < 0.05. MAT, the long-term average of mean annual temperature; CMI, the long-term average of mean annual climate moisture index; FDis, functional diversity. Higher CWMPC1值指示性状与贪婪有关strategy, whereas lower values indicate conservative strategy. Higher CWMPC2values indicate traits associated with lower tree maximum height (see Extended Data Fig.1).

Extended Data Fig. 7 The bivariate relationships between decadal relative changes in soil C and N stocks in the mineral horizon and mineral horizon soil C and N content, respectively.

All fitted regressions are significant atP < 0.05. Dotted vertical line represents the soil C or N content when relative changes in soil C and N stocks began to shift from positive to negative.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Structural equation models showing the effects of tree diversity, alternative climatic factors and soil conditions on decadal changes in soil C and N stocks.

a,b, Path diagrams of factors influencing changes in soil C and N stocks in the organic horizon (n = 361).b,dPath diagrams of factors influencing changes in soil C and N stocks in the mineral horizon (n = 245). Numbers adjacent to arrows are standardized path coefficients, analogous to relative regression weights. Solid and dashed arrows represent positive and negative relationships, respectively. Different colours represent different types of explanatory variable (see Fig.1). Only significant pathways are shown (P < 0.05). The goodness-of-fit statistics for panelsa–dare: GFI = 0.988, SRMR = 0.032,P = 0.249; GFI = 0.991, SRMR = 0.029,P = 0.477; GFI = 0.987, SRMR = 0.033,P = 0.367; and GFI = 0.986, SRMR = 0.038,P = 0.391, respectively, indicating close model-data fit. ΔSoil COrganicand ΔSoil NOrganicrepresent decadal changes in soil C and N stocks of the organic soil horizons, respectively. ΔSoil CMineraland ΔSoil NMineralrepresent decadal changes in soil C and N stocks of the mineral soil horizons, respectively. GDD, mean annual growing degree-days; AGP, mean annual precipitation at the growing season; FDis, functional diversity; ΔThickness, decadal changes in soil organic horizon thickness; CWMPC2community-weighted意味着特征值;地平线thickness, initial organic horizon thickness. Higher CWMPC2values indicate traits associated with lower tree maximum height (see Extended Data Fig.1).

Extended Data Table 1 Summary statistics (mean, s.d. and range) of the permanent sample plots across Canada (2002–2018)
Full size table
Extended Data Table 2 Functional trait values of major tree genus (>5% of the total basal area across all plots during the entire census) occurred from all the provinces
Full size table

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Taylor, A.R., Reich, P.B.et al.Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual.Nature(2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by ourTermsandCommunity Guidelines．If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefingnewsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing
Baidu
map